Marie Luc Fayeton
I would like to show that Masi's methodology for homeopathic consultation does not exclude other approaches. Should the physician so desire, it can guide and carry each of them to a greater depth down to the roots of the metaphysical disease. Masi leads us to the discovery of a new depth in those medications we believed we were acquainted with; through him we reach new information allowing us to prescribe what we would never have thought of prescribing before. Masi offers as working tools dictionaries and the Aristotelian-Thomistic anthropology, both of which act as safeguards in terms of the stringency of thought needed to help us learn to reason realistically and avoid delirious interpretations. As a result we are able to understand the healthy human being and the one who is ill, the harmonious function or the one lacking in harmony and, additionally, we are able to ask: this function under consideration — whether it is the intellect, the will, memory, biliary or glandular secretion, etc.. —, what is its use? In what way is it disturbed? Has it been sidetracked? In what way is it being misused?
This is what I would like to demonstrate through clinical cases where similitude is based on the hypothesis whereby each and every symptom of the medication, on the one hand, and each and every symptom of the patient, on the other, are united around a rejected human faculty which as a result of being rejected is lost and not utilized for it is judged as unworthy by man in his intention to function as divinity: “you shall be like gods.”